Primary Response - 10
Okay. Its the next day now, and obviously that became pretty ridiculous last night and if any of you are asking yourselves - hey, you know, what exactly was the point? - well you would certainly have a second in me.
And I'm not sure which was the most stupid: The relentless youtube rhino videos. That whole thing about Soldedad O'Brien. Or the picture.
Probably the picture.
But nonetheless, having started it all I do feel obliged to now try and wrap up our special Super Tuesday coverage some how. So I might as well go ahead and do that by linking to other people a lot more insightful about this kind of thing than me.
But first things first:
What are the post Super Tuesday delegate counts? Well, they vary apparently. And the difference lies with those who are counting "projected delegates" and those who are not.
Over at Politico they have -
For the Republicans:
McCain - 613
Romney - 269
Huckabee - 190
Paul - 14
With 1,191 needed to win.
Democrats:
Clinton - 845
Obama - 765
With 2,025 needed to win.
But hold on. This Slate article - Delegate Count Chaos! - goes into the issue deeper while dropping the wildy varying delegate count numbers from various news organizations.
On the Democratic race:
What seems interesting is, that despite what I said last night, Obama seemed to win a lot of heartland red States while not doing as well as he had hoped in either the Northeast (other than Connecticut) or the the two big prizes of New York and California.
This is certainly what initially impressed Karl Rove.
So what is at the heart of this Clinton - Obama divide?
For an idea you might want to read this e-mailer to TalkingPointsMemo.
David Frum of all people wonders if there is a class divide amongst the Democrats.
And yet considering where he was months, even weeks ago the fact that Obama was able to basically pull even in delegate counts, with some counts actually having him leading - is that evidence of a Obama surge?
Marc Ambinder points out that he is basically really well organized in some States, as he was in Iowa.
Andrew Sullivan is all for him.
While James Wolcott is not buying it. He's a Hillary man. And its a legitimate question: Obama talks so much about bi-partisanship, but what happens when the Republicans come after him guns blazing, or have no interest co-operating with him on anything.
Here's an interestingly analogy getting much play:
Obama's a Mac. Clinton's a PC.
George Packer demonstrates definitively why the Obama - JFK comparison is just lame, inaccurate, actually quite limiting and just a bad all around idea for Obama. And he's right. JFK is one of the most overrated Presidents ever.
Meanwhile over at the Republican tent, I'll keep this short:
One of the big questions for the moment is now that Mitt Romney has now spent 1.16 million dollars per delegate earned - which at that rate will cost him 1.33 Billion dollars (!) to win the nomination - will he now give up the ghost and finally drop out of the race?
And would Huckabee ever accept being McCain's VP? And would that be enough to placate all the GOP's right wing dittoheads?
But after all of this - the other obvious big question of the day is:
Good Lord.
That's it for me. For today. Elect whoever you want.
I give.


